Wolves should have made a move for Martin Odegaard

As reported by the BBC, Real Madrid have sent Martin Odegaard to join Dutch outfit Vitesse Arnhem on loan for the season.

What’s the story?

Odegaard has joined Vitesse on a season-long loan deal that marks the 19-year-old’s second temporary stint away from the Bernabeu since joining the Spanish giants as a 16-year-old in 2015.

[brid autoplay=”true” video=”279706″ player=”12034″ title=”Watch Danny Rose To PSG or Schalke”]

The Norway international has made only two appearances for the Los Blancos senior side, and has spent the last season and a half plying his trade in the Eredivisie with Heerenveen.

Odegaard shall now continue his development in Dutch football with Vitesse.

With Odegaard clearly having been made available by Real Madrid this summer, Wolves may now regret not having offered the youngster the opportunity to prove his worth in the Premier League.

Wolves and the wonderkid

Whilst Odegaard has struggled for consistency in recent seasons, the prodigious talent he displayed before being snapped up by Real Madrid at such a tender age ought not to be forgotten. At the time, Odegaard was considered one of the finest youth talents in world football as he made his senior Norway international debut at 15 years of age.

The now 19-year-old is still of an age where he is learning his craft, and inconsistency and dips in form are natural and to be expected. The teenager has bulked up recently though, making him much more of a physical presence on the pitch.

[ad_pod ]

It would have been fascinating to see him test himself in the Premier League this season, and Molineux would have been the perfect environment for him to do so.

Nuno Espirito Santo’s commitment to getting his side to play fast, attacking, technical football would have suited Odegaard well, and the Portuguese manager should be regretting not bringing the talented teenager to the club.

West Ham fans divided after they draw Arsenal away in the Carabao Cup

West Ham United were drawn away to Arsenal in the quarter-finals of the Carabao Cup following their incredible comeback against Tottenham Hotspur in the fourth round, and Irons fans are divided on their chances of beating the Gunners.

Slaven Bilic’s men looked to be heading out of the competition as they trailed 2-0 against Spurs at half-time at Wembley on Wednesday, but a second-half brace from Andre Ayew and a header from Angelo Ogbonna saw them advance to the last eight with a 3-2 win.

They now face another short trip across London to come up against Arsene Wenger’s side, who beat Championship side Norwich City 3-1 after extra-time on Tuesday.

West Ham supporters were quick to have their say on the draw via social media, and they were divided on the club’s chances of reaching the quarter-finals.

While some are confident and said they are “going to beat them”, others were more pessimistic and said “we are out”.

Here is just a selection of the Twitter reaction…

[ad_pod ]

Kante insists Chelsea have no room for slip-up

Chelsea midfielder N’Golo Kante has claimed that his team “have to win a minimum of five” of their final six games of the Premier League season in order to land the crown.

The Blues will enter Tuesday night’s home game with Southampton four points clear of second-place Tottenham Hotspur in the Premier League table.

Victory over the Saints would open up a seven-point lead at the summit, and Kante has insisted that every league game from this position is “like a final” due to Tottenham’s excellent form.

He told Chelsea’s official website:

“We had to bounce back after our defeat in Manchester and we played a very good game against Tottenham, it was my first time playing at Wembley.

“Now we have to focus until the end of the season, there are six games left and we have to give our best to win the league. We have to win a minimum of five and every game is like a final.

“It’s always better to play in front of our fans because their support helps us a lot so I think it’s an advantage to have four games at home and two away, but we have to win them.”

“We play tonight’s game after a very short period, just two full days, but we have a strong squad and we can change players and prepare very well, it’s not a problem.”

Chelsea appeared to be running away with the Premier League title earlier this year, but the Blues have lost two of their last five in the league to allow capital rivals Tottenham back into the race.

Antonio Conte’s side have also already lost at home in the league this month, with Crystal Palace running out 2-1 winners when they travelled to Stamford Bridge on April 1.

Five strikers Crystal Palace could buy with the Bolasie money

Crystal Palace’s sale of Yannick Bolasie might just be the best bit of business yet this summer.

Their Congolese winger is the ultimate entertainer, but his inconsistent end product makes his sale seem all the more sensible. The reinvestment of his hefty £25million fee will be important for Alan Pardew’s season, and it will likely be splashed on a centre-forward rather than a direct wide replacement for Bolasie.

Pardew has seen his forwards struggle to find the net throughout his time at the club and the loss of Bolasie takes a dimension away from their side. Wilfried Zaha will now carry the burden of being the most inconsistent, yet exciting, winger at the club.

Demand is far out-competing supply in the centre forward market this summer. Clubs are desperate for that forward who can fire them in to the European spots or push them away from the relegation battle.

Should one of these FIVE become the new Palace star?

Mame Diouf

As Stoke City continue to search for strikers like a dodgy ITV detective looks from blindingly obvious clues, Diouf is seeing more and more doubt cast upon his future with the Potters.

Despite impressing during brief spells with Hughes’ side, Diouf has become a utility forward in many ways. Used on the wing at least as often as he is trusted in the number nine role, the former Manchester United striker is clearly under appreciated at the Bet 365 Stadium.

Diouf isn’t the big name that many Palace fans will hope for, but he could well be a shrewd addition.

Wilfried Bony

Bony’s stock has fallen dramatically during his ill-fated spell with Manchester City. The Ivorian was one of the Premier League’s best strikers whilst at Swansea and has, unfortunately, disappeared into the background in a star-studded Manchester City squad.

Able to link play, challenge the defence in behind and score goals from a range of different situations, Bony is the perfect striker for a fast-transitioning side like Pardew’s Palace.

The price will be hefty, sure, but what a signing he would be.

Britt Assombalonga

Although injury meant Assombalonga missed almost the entirety of the 2015/16 Championship season, the forward should still be considered by Pardew.

Far more of a wildcard option than the majority of the others on this list, the Nottingham Forest star is still only 23 and has proven himself as a reliable finisher. He possesses the pace and power to cause real trouble for Premier League defences, which would help him fit in to the Palace attack.

Saido Berahino

Berahino’s brief trouble at West Brom seems to have disappeared relatively now, but it still looks as though the 23-year-old is going to be on the move from the Baggies sooner or later.

After his 14 goal breakthrough Premier League season in 2014/15, Berahino spent much of last season playing in a wider role. He is not the same physical presence to many that Pardew will be considering, but his ability to find the back of the net is unquestionable.

Carlos Bacca

With AC Milan continuing to suffer a turbulent period, Carlos Bacca’s future has been under question for much of this summer. The Colombian has proven himself as one of the more rounded strikers in the top European leagues and netted 37% of Milan’s Serie A goals last season.

With the pace to stretch defences, the leap to challenge aerially and the experience to lead the line with ease, Bacca would be a real coup for Palace.

Jude Bellingham: England finally have a generational player to end almost 60 years of tournament hurt at Euro 2024

The Three Lions may be renowned for falling short when it matters most, but the Real Madrid star can inspire them to glory at Euro 2024

This must be a pretty good time to be an England fan. Qualification for yet another major tournament should be wrapped up by this time next week – and the Three Lions will doubtless arrive in Germany for Euro 2024 as one of the favourites.

Some supporters will be nervous, though. England have become dangerously competitive again under Gareth Southgate, who has, for the most part, done a fine job restoring faith in the national team – and yet their campaigns continue to end in bitter disappointment, one could argue because the heightened sense of expectancy makes (the usually penalty-related) knockout-stage exit even tougher to take.

England's players genuinely believed that they could win the 2022 World Cup, though, and that was wholly understandable. A semi-final run in Russia had been followed by a runners-up finish at Euro 2020. Victory in Qatar seemed the obvious, logical conclusion for a well-balanced squad blessed with several exciting young talents.

  • Getty Images

    Frustrating failure to defeat France

    Jude Bellingham certainly believed as soon as they saw off Senegal in the last 16. There were just three wins standing between England and a first World Cup since 1966, and he was certain that they could win the first of them, against defending champions France. In fairness, they really should have done.

    Bellingham left the field at the Al-Bayt Stadium on the night of December 10 in tears after a frustrating 2-1 loss, and when he faced the cameras afterwards, the clearly-still emotional teenager insisted that the better team had lost.

    The stats certainly supported that claim. England had dominated possession, won more duels, completed more passes and had twice as many shots on goal (16-8). Kyle Walker had also done an excellent job keeping Kylian Mbappe quiet – something considered unthinkable at the time, given the winger's stunning form – but there was simply no containing Antoine Griezmann, who was involved in both of his side' goals.

    The fear had certainly been before the eagerly-awaited quarter-final that France had more experienced and proven match-winners, leading to the undeniable feeling that persisted throughout the game that while France knew how to get the job done, England still did not.

  • Advertisement

  • Getty

    'I don't lack confidence'

    There was, then, almost an inevitability about Harry Kane missing a penalty that would have forced extra-time – in spite of the fact that he had already converted one shortly after half-time. It just felt like a fittingly farcical – and painful – way for England to exit the tournament.

    Consequently, it was thought that Southgate's time was up; that he had taken the team as far as he could – and, even more damningly, wasted England's best chance to win a World Cup for decades because of his perceived conservativeness. Bellingham, though, was having none of it. He wasn't traumatised by England's campaign in Qatar; he was emboldened by it.

    "I personally enjoyed the kind of pressure of the games and the responsibility that the manager gave me," he explained afterwards in an interview with FIFA. "I think you can create [extra] pressure yourself through lack of preparation and confidence. Luckily, I don't lack confidence and I always try to stay prepared. I'm always quite confident I can achieve the things I want to achieve."

    And Bellingham has his sights firmly fixed on lifting a major trophy with England.

  • Getty

    No more hiding from expectation

    Only this week, when he was asked by about his targets with the national team, he matter-of-factly replied, "My goal for the next 12 months with England will be the same for the next 10-15 years: try to win major tournaments.

    "I think we can't shy away from saying that now. We've come close in the last few tournaments, and to now go back and say: 'Ah yeah, that was enjoyable, but now we have to be more realistic'…I don’t see the point.

    "We should use the experiences we've got from previous tournaments to push on and bring some silverware home. That's the common goal that we are striving towards and we aren’t afraid to say that anymore. In the last few years it's been a case of hiding that expectation, so that we never fail. We've got to be willing to say it, so we can achieve it."

    And why shouldn't both he and his team-mates believe themselves capable of taking the title home?

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty

    Will Southgate allow Bellingham to shine?

    France are the only other team in Europe with a similar strength in depth all over the park and England's only real weakness is Southgate's propensity for playing it too safe – and arguably being far too loyal to underperforming players such as Harry Maguire.

    Certainly, if Bellingham is afforded the same freedom bestowed upon him by Real Madrid – "He doesn't have a fixed position," according to coach Carlo Ancelotti – the Birmingham native will flourish in an exciting side that should also contain budding superstars such as Bukayo Saka, Declan Rice and Phil Foden.

    The challenge, once again, for Southgate will be figuring out the best combinations in both midfield and attack, and that will not be easy. But the primary objective should clearly be building a team around Bellingham – because he is more than capable of inspiring England to victory in Germany.

    Of course, whether the fans want to start banging the drum again is open to debate. They've been burned so many times before that some devastated supporters even suggested ditching 'Football's Coming Home' as an unofficial anthem after their latest tournament trauma. However, there is simply no getting away from the fact that they are more than capable of winning Euro 2024 – and Bellingham, with his burgeoning self-belief, is one of the main reasons why.

Arsenal vs Southampton: Where to watch the match online, live stream, TV channels & kick-off time

How to watch and stream Arsenal vs Southampton in the Premier League on TV and online in the United States.

Arsenal take on Southampton in a crucial Premier League clash at the Emirates Stadium on Friday.

▶Watch Arsenal vs Southampton live on Sling TV today!

▶Watch Arsenal vs Southampton live on Sky Sports today!

The hosts are unbeaten in their last 23 Premier League home games against Southampton (W16 D7), the most one side has hosted another without ever losing in the competition.

However, Mikel Arteta's side let a two-goal lead slip in each of their last two Premier League games (2-2 draws at both Liverpool and West Ham), which made them just the fifth side in the competition's history to do so.

Indeed, the Gunners have dropped as many points from being ahead in these two games (four) as they had in their previous 47 matches (draws with Southampton and Brentford this season).

Meanwhile, Southampton find themselves at the bottom of the table and are desperate for points. They have won just six times in the league this season out of 31 appearances and taking on Arsenal at the Emirates is a daunting task, to say the least.

GOAL brings you details on how to watch the game on TV in the U.S.

  • (C)Getty Images

    Kick-off time

    Game:

    Arsenal vs Southampton

    Date:

    April 21, 2023

    Kick-off:

    4:00 pm ET

    Venue:

    Emirates Stadium

    The game is scheduled for April 21, at Emirates Stadium. It will kick off at 4 pm ET in the U.S.

  • Advertisement

  • Getty

    How to watch Arsenal vs Southampton on TV & live stream online

    In theUnited States (USA), the game will be broadcasted on theUSA NetworkandUNIVERSOand can be live-streamed onSling TVandNBC Sports app/website.

    Country TV Channel Live stream
    US USA Network, UNIVERSO Sling TV, NBC Sports app/website.

    Check out GOAL's Soccer on US TV guide

  • Team news & squads

    Arsenal team news

    Arsenal have a few injury concerns going into this fixture as they are certainly going to miss Mohamed Elneny, William Saliba and Takehiro Tomiyasu.

    Meanwhile, Oleksandr Zinchenko's return gets delayed and Kieran Tierney will continue to start in the XI.

    "We will see that one as well, not certain. It's a muscle injury, and he needs some time to heal. We're not there yet," Arteta informed.

    Position

    Players

    Goalkeepers

    Ramsdale, Turner.

    Defenders

    Gabriel, Kiwior, Holding, White.

    Midfielders

    Partey, Jorginho, Xhaka, Smith Rowe, Vieira, Odegaard.

    Forwards

    Martinelli, Trossard, Saka, Nelson, Jesus, Nketiah.

    Southampton team news

    Juan Larios, Valentino Livramento, Mislav Orsic and Mohammed Salisu are injured while Ainsley Maitland-Niles is not eligible against his parent club.

    Romain Perraud is likely to replace Maitland-Niles.

    However, Che Adams might return to the squad after overcoming a calf issue.

    Position Players
    Goalkeepers: Bazunu, McCarthy, Cabellero
    Defenders: Caleta-Car, Lyanco, Perraud, Bree, Bella-Kotchap
    Midfielders: Lavia, Diallo, Ward-Prowse, Alcaraz, S. Armstrong, Aribo, Sulemana, Elyounoussi, Djenepo, Edozie, Walcott
    Forwards: A. Armstrong, Onuachu, Mara, Adams

    Head-to-head record

    Date Result Competition
    23/10/2022 Southampton 1-1 Arsenal Premier League
    16/04/2022 Southampton 1-0 Arsenal Premier League
    11/12/2021 Arsenal 3-0 Southampton Premier League
    27/01/2021 Southampton 1-3 Arsenal Premier League
    23/01/2021 Southampton 1-0 Arsenal FA Cup
  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty

    Useful links

    • Arsenal team page
    • Southampton team page
    • Live soccer on U.S. TV

Man Utd winners, losers & ratings as super subs Rashford & Martial rescue Red Devils

The substitutions of Marcus Rashford and Anthony Martial saved Manchester United from embarrassment against Omonia Nicosia.

Heading into half-time a goal behind thanks to a great finish from Karim Ansarifard, Erik ten Hag needed changes, desperately.

He replaced Jadon Sancho and Tyrell Malacia – who had torrid first halves – with Rashford and Luke Shaw and the rest is history. The former took less than 10 minutes to drag his side level and he would be involved in the other two goals that the Red Devils would score.

Anthony Martial was also brought into the action and he combined with his fellow substitute immediately after coming on to give Manchester United the lead.

As the game opened up, Cristiano Ronaldo continued to hunt a 700th club career goal and it was one of his shots that brought the third goal as Rashford tapped in at the back post with an open goal at his mercy.

After all that, there was time for more panic from the visitors as they allowed the hosts a glimmer of hope. Nikolas Panayiotou found the back of the net in the 85th minute but Manchester United were able to cling on for an important victory.

Below, GOAL runs through the winners and losers from the 3-2 win in Cyprus.

Getty ImagesThe Winners

Marcus Rashford:

The 24-year-old continues to enjoy something of a renaissance for Manchester United this season. Having been rested, he came onto the pitch at half-time for Jadon Sancho and changed the game almost single-handedly.

Less than 10 minutes after being introduced, he dragged his side back on level terms with an excellent finish into the far corner. Another 10 minutes later and he turned provider, supplying a lovely flick to Martial before adding a second goal of the night with a simple tap-in from Ronaldo's cross-cum-shot.

Anthony Martial:

Speaking of the Frenchman, he's another who came out of the game shining. He replaced Fernandes in the 61st minute and scored a brilliant goal in the 63rd minute.

Like Rashford, he has injected some much-needed life into his Manchester United career recently and he extended his run of providing a goal contribution in every game he has played this season. In just over 100 minutes of football in the Premier League and Europa League, he has scored three goals and added one assist.

Cristiano Ronaldo:

The 700th club career goal still eludes the 37-year-old but it was his most complete performance of the season. His link-up play was much improved and his runs helped his teammates, most notably the one he made which gave Rashford space for the equaliser.

Yes, he should have scored at least once but it was a performance from Ronaldo that shows he can still play a key role in a fluid attacking line-up. His combination and relationship with Rashford could also be very important for Ten Hag as the season goes on.

AdvertisementGetty ImagesThe Losers

Jadon Sancho:

It couldn't have been a much worse evening for him. He struggled to impose himself on the game in the first half, stitched up Malacia for the opener and was replaced by the goalscoring Rashford at half-time.

A couple of goals this season are still failing to mask a really poor start to life at Old Trafford. United supporters are still waiting on the return on the (significant) investment on the 22-year-old from last year.

Tyrell Malacia:

A rare blot on a rather strong copybook for the young left-back this evening. Going forward, he was largely invisible and he made the crucial error that could have brought disaster for Manchester United.

The second-half goals from Rashford and Martial ultimately bailed him out but it is unacceptable to make such a costly mistake against opposition like Omonia. Fortunately, he was taken out of the spotlight at half-time by Ten Hag.

Erik ten Hag's team selection:

While his substitutions changed the game in a positive way, his decision to start a very strong team backfired. The Manchester United boss will have been hoping that the game was wrapped up early on so that he could rest his players for the Premier League clash on Sunday night.

That wasn't the case at all and he actually had to strengthen his side from the bench to ensure they picked up an important victory. The win was important but it will still be worrying just how complex the visitors made it look against their Cypriot opposition.

GettyRatings: Defence

David de Gea (5/10): Only made one save all night but had to pick the ball out of his net twice. Couldn't really do much for either of the goals but such is the business of being a goalkeeper.

Diogo Dalot (6/10): A solid, if unspectacular, performance. Defended well when asked and even created a gilt-edged chance for his compatriot Ronaldo which he somehow missed.

Victor Lindelof (6/10): Similarly to Dalot, did enough when he had to but still part of a defence that conceded two goals against extremely inferior opposition.

Lisandro Martinez (7/10): The stand-out defender for Manchester United, by some way. His passing through the lines was excellent and his defending was typically aggressive and perfectly-timed.

Tyrell Malacia (4/10): After a relatively bright to start to life at United, it was an evening to forget for the youngster. It was his indecision that led to the hosts pinching the ball and scoring the opening goal. He was rightly replaced at half-time.

ENJOYED THIS STORY?

Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

Getty ImagesMidfield

Casemiro (6/10): An unsurprisingly solid performance from the five-time Champions League winner. It wasn't quite a stand-out performance but he did the basics with ease.

Christian Eriksen (6/10): Another visiting player who was solid and nothing else. He looked after the ball well every time he had it but didn't do anything extraordinary.

Bruno Fernandes (5/10): These are the kind of games where you'd expect him to stand out and dictate the attacking proceedings but he wasn't good enough. Although, his performance was saved by a pinpoint long-range ball that brought Rashford's equaliser before being substituted for Martial.

Rohit admits to Mumbai's relocation struggles

Mumbai Indians captain Rohit Sharma admitted that his side did not calibrate their batting tactics to suit the slow pitch at the ACA-VDCA Stadium in their seven-wicket defeat to Kings XI Punjab

Arun Venugopal in Visakhapatnam14-May-2016

Rohit Sharma on Mumbai Indians’ plan in the Powerplay: “We thought we had to bat in the first six overs really well and put pressure on them. That is why we went for shots and by doing that, we lost wickets.”•BCCI

On the surface, Mumbai and Visakhapatnam have a couple of things in common – they are both port cities and have similar tropical climate. But, the slow and sticky pitches at the ACA-VDCA Stadium, Mumbai Indians’ new home ground, are the antithesis of the Wankhede Stadium surface that’s known for producing big totals.Mumbai Indians had won two of their four home games at the Wankhede Stadium before IPL matches were moved out of Maharashtra. On the evidence of their two games in Visakhapatnam, they haven’t taken the relocation well. Their batting let them down on both the occasions – they only managed totals of 92 and 124 against Sunrisers Hyderabad and Kings XI Punjab.On Friday, Mumbai’s failure to recalibrate their batting according to the conditions was best illustrated by two stats – a dot-ball percentage of 53, and only 54 runs scored through ones, twos and threes. Nitish Rana’s 28-ball 25, which featured 16 dots and three sixes, was an example of that approach. His innings was an all-or-nothing tale of a sequence of dots followed by a six. That Mumbai’s batsmen didn’t recognise the relatively higher value of the single on a surface that didn’t assist big hitting wasn’t lost on the team’s captain, Rohit Sharma.”We all know how the Wankhede wicket plays – it’s a good batting track and the ball comes on nicely,” Rohit said. “But, when you play on these kinds of wickets where the ball is turning and stopping you’ve just got to rotate [the strike] as much as possible initially. If you don’t, the pressure just keeps building.”Mumbai crawled to 21 for 2 for the lowest Powerplay score in IPL 2016. They had fared worse against Sunrisers, slipping to 32 for 5 in six overs. Rohit admitted his team was also hurt by a desire to dictate terms upfront which resulted in the wickets of Unmukt Chand and Ambati Rayudu in the Powerplay. They have now lost 19 wickets in their two games in Visakhapatnam.”We thought we had to bat in the first six overs really well and put pressure on them,” Rohit said. “That is why we went for shots and by doing that, we lost wickets.”We all saw in the last three games that were played here, it is so difficult to get eight or nine an over in the end, because the wicket keeps getting slower and slower. So, it’s important that you capitalise on the first six overs really well. In the middle overs, you just knock it around, get around six to seven runs and over, which we were not able to do today. We lost early wickets in the Powerplay.”You’ve got to apply a little more on such wickets. We all know that in Mumbai you can catch up, in Bangalore you can catch up, but on a wicket like this, the first ten overs are pretty important.”Mumbai have also been rigid with their tactic of playing two overseas fast bowlers in Mitchell McClenaghan and Tim Southee at the expense of more batting muscle in the form of Martin Guptill or even an allrounder like Corey Anderson. While McClenaghan and Southee have been the enforcers with the ball, the side recognised they are slightly light on their batting and subsequently dropped Parthiv Patel and Hardik Pandya. With only two more games left – they play Delhi Daredevils on Sunday before flying to Kanpur to take on Gujarat Lions on May 21 – they have to act quickly and Rohit hinted at strengthening the batting through the inclusion of Guptill.”It’s something we can consider, playing three [overseas] batters,” he said. “We know we’ve to win two out of two. Probably batting is something which has let us down in the last couple of games. Although we chased down in the last game [against Royal Challengers Bangalore], but that situation shouldn’t have risen – in the last six overs, we needed about 68 runs. When you’re chasing 152, you expect your top order to do most of the job.”I don’t believe that the whole pressure and run-scoring is on me. We’ve won games without me scoring as well. It’s just that the whole batting squad needs to believe that whatever happens, we’ll pull off a win.”

India's pride on the line as hosts eye historic series win

Match facts

Sunday, June 21, 2015
Start time 1500 local (0900 GMT)1:34

Muthu: India have to improve in many areas

Big picture

Roughly once every three bilateral series, Bangladesh win the first match. They have done the same in the last two series at home, against Zimbabwe and Pakistan. There used to be a time in the mid-2000s when Bangladesh starting off well meant complacency, but the current team has shown more consistency.India have never seen this side of Bangladesh before. The hosts have been beaten India just four times, including the 79-run victory on Thursday. The three other wins – 2004, 2007 and 2012 – came sporadically and only of those was in a bilateral series. India were ultimately knocked out of the 2007 World Cup, and failed to make the final of the 2012 Asia Cup following the other two defeats.India were given an early taste of the new Bangladesh when Tamim Iqbal and Soumya Sarkar added the team’s first 100-plus opening stand against India. They brought about a wobble but soon enough, Shakib Al Hasan and Sabbir Rahman rescued a flagging innings. Bangladesh’s 307 was also their first 300-plus score against India.R Ashwin was once again India’s standout bowler, getting the breakthroughs and keeping a tight leash whenever possible. Among their three-man pace attack however, Mohit Sharma’s 53 off 4.4 overs was far too costly even on a slow wicket. MS Dhoni’s other handicap was Ravindra Jadeja, who bowled eight overs while Suresh Raina completing his 10. Dhoni will also expect Virat Kohli and Shikhar Dhawan to come good with the bat and Rohit Sharma to build on his promising starts.Bangladesh’s traditional comfort in ODIs as compared to Tests and T20s, has reflected in their numbers this year. Before the first ODI, Mashrafe Mortaza had asked his side to play like a top-four team, and going by the number of wins in 2015, Bangladesh are fourth behind World Cup finalists New Zealand, world champions Australia, and South Africa.

Form guide

Bangladesh: WWWWL (last five matches, most recent first)

India: LLWWW

In the spotlight

When Tamim Iqbal gets a 50-plus score, he invariably bats at a higher strike-rate. His 60 in the first ODI came at a similar tempo, but he gave his wicket away too soon. Bangladesh would want a similar but longer innings.The last time Virat Kohli had a string of low scores was just before the World Cup, when he made 9, 4, 3* and 8 in the tri-series against England and Australia. He responded with a century against Pakistan in the World Cup opener. Bangladesh will be wary.

Team news

The home side are likely to continue with their new four-man pace attack. Arafat Sunny may only get a look in if there’s a last-minute injury or the team management sees something different in the Mirpur pitch. Mominul Haque and Rony Talukdar are likely to bide their time in the bench.Bangladesh (probable): 1 Tamim Iqbal, 2 Soumya Sarkar, 3 Litton Das, 4 Mushfiqur Rahim (wk), 5 Shakib Al Hasan, 6 Sabbir Rahman, 7 Nasir Hossain, 8 Mashrafe Mortaza (capt), 9 Rubel Hossain, 10 Mustafizur Rahman, 11 Taskin Ahmed.Rohit Sharma, at the pre-match press conference, didn’t give any indication of India pondering changes. Dhoni had also said after the first ODI that he thought they bowled to their strengths. But Stuart Binny is an option if India want a longer batting line-up and a tight medium-pacer. Dhawal Kulkarni is also around if they want to experiment.India (probable): 1 Shikhar Dhawan, 2 Rohit Sharma, 3 Virat Kohli, 4 Ajinkya Rahane, 5 Suresh Raina 6 MS Dhoni (capt &wk), 7 Ravindra Jadeja, 8 R Ashwin, 9 Bhuvneshwar Kumar, 10 Umesh Yadav, 11 Mohit Sharma.

Pitch and conditions

The entire strip of pitches in Mirpur does not change much in character. There will be enough abrasion for the spinners to come into play early on. Rain has once again been forecast in Mirpur on Sunday.

Stats and trivia

<ul class="editorialList"

  • Bangladesh are on their longest winning streak at home – nine games. They beat Zimbabwe 5-0 and Pakistan 3-0 before taking the 1-0 lead over India. Their previous best run was from November 30 to December 17, 2006.
  • Mustafizur Rahman became the seventh Bangladesh pace bowler to take five or more wickets in an ODI. Spinners have taken five five-fors.

    Quotes

    “I am not happy at all with the last game. That’s the scary part: we still can improve in all departments. We played better against Pakistan. I think we are looking to improve from the next game.””They have got nothing to lose. India have everything to lose. We have to extra careful.”

  • Scorers accountable for T20 final chaos – USACA board member

    Rizwan Mohammed, a USACA board member, of the USA Cricket Association, defended the on-field umpires and acknowledged that a lack of communication from the official scorers was the main reason for confusion in the final of last weekend’s USACA T20 Nationa

    Peter Della Penna11-Apr-2015

    Nisarg Patel had been issued with a formal warning for running on the pitch, according to umpire Mohamed Baksh•Peter Della Penna

    Rizwan Mohammed, a board member of the USA Cricket Association, defended the actions of the on-field umpires and acknowledged that a lack of communication from the official scorers was the main reason for confusion in the final of last weekend’s USACA T20 National Championship in Florida.South East defeated USA Development XI in controversial circumstances last Sunday after being awarded five penalty runs. According to the live update feed on USACA’s official Facebook page, USA Development XI won the game taking the winning single off the final delivery of the match, but about 40 minutes later it replaced that announcement with: “UPDATE: The USA Development team was penalized 5 runs for a batsman obstructing the fielder. The 2015 USACA National T20 Champion is the South East Region!”Rizwan was inside the scoring box for the match, updating the online electronic scoring system. David Maitland, the South East Region secretary, was designated as the official scorer for the match and was keeping score by hand as well as working the electronic scoreboard at the Central Broward Regional Park.The on-field umpires for the final were two of the region’s most experienced – Hubert Smythe, representing Cayman Islands, has stood in every ICC Americas Division One tournament since 2004 and has officiated in other ICC global events, such as 2009 ICC WCL Division Three in Argentina and the 2009 ICC U-19 World Cup Qualifier in Canada; Mohamed Baksh is a WICB-certified umpire who has more than 30 years of experience officiating in the West Indies, most recently in last year’s WICB U-19 Regional Tournament.In a conference call with ESPNcricinfo this week, Baksh said that a formal warning was issued to opening batsman Nisarg Patel for running on the pitch. ESPNcricinfo spoke to several players on both teams, including at least two players from the USA Development XI who confirmed that upon arriving at the crease after the fall of a wicket later in the game, the umpires had immediately informed them that the side had earlier been issued a warning for running on the pitch and another transgression would result in a five-run penalty.On the last ball of the 18th over in the USA Development XI chase, Baksh says he signaled for five penalty runs to be awarded to the fielding side after batsmen Andre Lindsay and Keneil Irving violated earlier warnings, and ran down the pitch while attempting to complete two runs, which were also disallowed. Rizwan says that both he and Maitland saw the signal for five penalty runs but were unsure which team the penalty runs had been assessed to. The third umpire, Neil Jamula, was stationed in a separate area of the ground so the scorers were unable to get an immediate clarification. Rather than wait to get a clarification before proceeding, a flickering light signal was given by Maitland from the scorebox to the umpires as an acknowledgement because Rizwan says they did not want to cause any delays.”We did not want the game to stop,” Rizwan said. “The game was continuing and anything that we had for someone to go down and check with the umpires would have caused the game to stop for a few minutes and we didn’t want to do that. Definitely there were some gaps, there’s no question about that but nothing was done intentionally wrong.”Because they did not seek an immediate clarification, Rizwan says that Maitland chose not to update the stadium’s electronic scoreboard until they spoke with the umpires after the end of the match to be completely sure which side had been given the penalty runs. Baksh says both batsmen, and South East captain Steven Taylor, were informed at the time of the penalty that it was USA Development XI who had been penalized. However, both Baksh and South East coach Mark Johnson confirmed they never saw the scoreboard change to show an adjusted target from 113 to 118.”I saw the signal for penalty runs and shouted out to the field to ask Taylor which team had been penalised,” Johnson told ESPNcricinfo. “He told me it wasn’t us and it was the other team. Heading into the final over I looked at the target on the scoreboard and even though it showed 21 runs to win, we knew it was 26 because it was also still showing our total as 112.”Players on the USA Development XI acknowledge receiving warnings but neither they, nor the coach Reginald Benjamin, remember seeing a signal for penalty runs being assessed against them.Rizwan says the situation was exacerbated by the fact that the person in charge of social media for USACA during the tournament final, former USA women’s player Nadia Gruny, was unaware of the penalty runs being awarded and posted a message onto the official USACA Facebook page declaring that USA Development XI had won the championship with a single off the final ball. About 40 minutes later, the post was deleted and Gruny added a new message stating that South East had won thanks to the penalty runs. The post initially stated the penalty runs were awarded for “obstructing the fielder” and then was changed again 11 hours later to state it was for a “running on the pitch infraction.”Even after the final, there was still some confusion regarding the scoring. Rather than add penalty runs to South East’s score, the official online scorecard for the match showed five runs subtracted from USA Development XI’s total, an error that remained until Thursday, four days after the final, before it was finally amended.Several players on both the South East and USA Development XI also said there were consistent scoring problems throughout the tournament, including the final. In one instance, David Pieters, a fast bowler originally from South Africa, was incorrectly credited with the first two wickets for USA Development XI instead of Jasdeep Singh, who wears a patka while playing. In another match, right-arm pacer Jasdeep’s two wickets were credited to Arsh Buch, a left-arm bowler.As for the assessment of the penalty runs themselves, Baksh stood by his decision and was supported by Fitzroy Hayles, president of the USA Cricket Umpires Association. Baksh acknowledged that theoretically a batsman running on the pitch in the second innings of a Twenty20 match would be harming the pitch for his team but said running on the pitch is illegal regardless of when it happens. Baksh also said he observed that it was a consistent problem among USA players who developed bad habits by running down the wicket because the majority of club matches are played on matting wickets with batsmen wearing sneakers. If they run on the pitch in those instances it is never penalized because no damage can be done to the artificial surface.”Law 42 is very clear,” Baksh said. “The batsman, whether they are batting last or first, should not be running on the protected area of the pitch and it is the duty of the umpire to protect the integrity of the pitch. We don’t want any side to have an unfair advantage, although it may seem as though in that instance the unfair advantage might appear to be against the batting team. These cricketers are not used to playing on turf wickets. When I officiate U-19 matches in the West Indies, I never seen them run on the wicket but it happens all the time in the USA. If they go off to an ICC tournament, they’re going to find themselves in trouble with the umpires. We have to sensitize our players to the protected area on a turf wicket that you cannot touch.”

    Game
    Register
    Service
    Bonus